Get the Flash Stretch Assessment. Maximize Tiering to Offset Price Hikes. Learn How

Data Management Must Replace Storage Management

Data Management Must Replace Storage Management

Moving from Storage Management to Data Management

Unstructured data growth and storage proliferation are urgent problems that IT organizations can no longer ignore. Data outlives storage—so why manage data through a storage silo? IT organizations need data-centric management that is a separate layer working across storage and cloud to analyze and move data without creating lock-in. The right approach to unstructured data management provides the visibility required to gain a holistic understanding of the storage landscape. This means that IT can make storage decisions that maximize the value of data, optimize storage costs, and increase agility.

Storage Management to Data Management Highlights
  • The limits of storage management for data value
  • Why it’s time to manage data, not storage
  • Data management software benefits and capabilities
  • Key criteria for evaluating data management software

DCIG-thumbnail-768x996

About DCIG

The Data Center Intelligence Group (DCIG) empowers the IT industry with actionable analysis. DCIG analysts provide informed third-party analysis of various cloud, data protection, and data storage technologies. DCIG independently develops licensed content in the form of TOP 5 Reports and Solution Profiles. More information is available at www.dcig.com.

What is data management for unstructured data and why must it replace storage management?

Data management for unstructured data is a storage-agnostic, data-centric approach to analyzing, classifying, moving, and governing file and object data across all storage environments — on-premises NAS, cloud object storage, and hybrid infrastructure — independent of the storage vendor or technology in which that data resides. It must replace storage management because storage management is fundamentally limited to optimizing the performance and capacity of a single vendor’s storage system, not the data itself. The core reasons for this shift, as identified by DCIG:

  • Data outlives storage — storage hardware is refreshed every three to five years, but the data it contains must be retained for decades; managing data through a storage silo creates dependencies that become progressively more expensive to exit when hardware reaches end of life
  • Storage management creates lock-in — storage-vendor tools leverage the vendor’s own file system to provide management capabilities, which means all tiering configurations, metadata, and data movement policies are tied to that file system; replacing the storage requires rehydrating all managed data first
  • No cross-silo visibility — storage management tools provide visibility only within their own environment; enterprises managing data across NetApp, Dell, IBM, VAST Data, Everpure and cloud providers have no unified view, no consistent policy enforcement, and no way to optimize costs across the full data estate
  • AI demands data-centric management — AI initiatives require finding, curating, and governing specific datasets across the entire unstructured data estate; storage management tools have no ability to query across silos, enrich metadata, or deliver governed datasets to AI pipelines
  • The right approach — data management software works as a separate layer above storage, analyzing and moving data without creating lock-in, providing the visibility required to make storage decisions that maximize data value and optimize costs across any combination of vendors and clouds

What are the specific limitations of storage management for enterprise unstructured data and what problems does it create?

Storage management was designed to optimize storage infrastructure, not to manage the data that lives on it. As unstructured data volumes have grown to petabyte scale and AI has made data quality a strategic imperative, the limitations of storage management have become increasingly costly. The four core limitations identified by DCIG:

  • Silo-centric visibility — each storage vendor’s management tools provide analytics only for their own arrays; enterprises with multi-vendor environments have no unified view of data age, access patterns, ownership, or cost across the full estate, making informed storage decisions impossible
  • Proprietary tiering creates lock-in — storage-vendor tiering solutions move data in proprietary block formats that can only be accessed through the originating file system; when hardware reaches end of life, organizations must rehydrate all tiered data before migrating, which can mean moving petabytes back to primary storage before they can move forward
  • No data-level intelligence — storage management tools work at the block or volume level and have no awareness of file content, metadata enrichment, sensitivity status, or AI relevance; they cannot answer questions like “find all chest X-rays for male patients over 35” or “identify files containing PII across specific file storage” (see Data Intelligence)
  • Unable to support AI workflows — feeding AI pipelines with the right unstructured data requires cross-silo discovery, metadata enrichment, sensitive data exclusion, and governed ingestion; none of these capabilities exist in storage management tools, which is why enterprises attempting to leverage unstructured data for AI without a data management layer are forced into manual, ad hoc processes that do not scale

What are the key benefits of adopting a data-centric unstructured data management approach and how does Komprise deliver them?

A data-centric management approach delivers benefits across four dimensions simultaneously: cost optimization, operational agility, data security, and AI readiness. Because it operates as a layer independent of storage, the same platform delivers all four without requiring changes to existing infrastructure. The Komprise Intelligent Data Management approach:

  • Cost optimizationKomprise Analysis identifies exactly how much data is cold across all storage silos and models three-year savings scenarios before any data is moved; patented Komprise Transparent Move Technology then tiers cold data to lower-cost storage transparently, reclaiming 70%+ of primary storage capacity while simultaneously reducing backup and DR footprints; Pfizer reduced storage and cloud costs by 70 to 75% using this approach
  • Operational agilityKomprise Elastic Data Migration moves data up to 27x faster than standard tools across any combination of storage platforms, with full metadata fidelity, integrity checks, and chain of custody reporting; patented Komprise Elastic Shares technology applies dynamic partitioning to keep all compute resources fully utilized at petabyte scale, delivering near-linear speed-up across migrations, tiering, and AI data processing jobs
  • Data security and complianceKomprise Sensitive Data Management detects PII and other sensitive data across the full unstructured data estate and provides automated remediation by policy to prevent leakage into AI tools and reduce breach risk; every data movement and access event is logged with full audit trails for HIPAA, GDPR, and internal governance requirements
  • AI readiness — the Komprise Global Metadatabase continuously indexes standard and enriched metadata across all storage silos, enabling Smart Data Workflows to identify and deliver exactly the right datasets for AI pipelines; KAPPA data services extract custom, domain-specific metadata from proprietary file formats at petabyte scale using serverless processing, enriching the Global Metadatabase with the context AI models need to produce accurate results

What criteria should enterprises use to evaluate unstructured data management software and how does Komprise meet them?

In the paper, DCIG identifies four key criteria for evaluating data management software. Each criterion addresses a failure mode of storage-vendor-native and point-solution approaches. Here is how Komprise meets each one:

  • Cross-environment visibility — Komprise Analysis provides a unified view across all NAS, cloud, and object storage silos simultaneously, showing file age, type, owner, access patterns, sensitivity status, and cost projections across the full hybrid estate from a single interface; this is the foundation for every cost, governance, and AI decision
  • Data mobility without lock-in — Komprise writes tiered and migrated data in native file and object formats using standard NFS, SMB, and S3 protocols; data is directly accessible at the destination without routing through the source storage system, and Komprise Dynamic Links eliminate rehydration penalties entirely when switching storage vendors
  • Data value and AI enablement — Komprise Smart Data Workflows let users define and execute automated processes to find precise data across billions of files, execute external functions on subsets of data, and tag data with additional metadata for AI ingestion and governance; KAPPA Data Services extend this to custom, domain-specific metadata extraction at petabyte scale using serverless processing
  • Agentless, non-disruptive architecture — Komprise Observers deploy as virtual appliances using standard protocols with no agents, no stubs, and no changes to existing storage or application configurations; the platform is never in the hot data path, so storage and application performance are completely unaffected during analysis, tiering, migration, and AI workflow operations

How should enterprises transition from a storage management approach to a data management approach for unstructured data?

The transition from storage management to data management does not require replacing existing storage infrastructure. It requires adopting a data management layer that works above and across existing storage systems, treating data as an asset independent of the hardware it happens to reside on. A practical transition framework:

  • Start with visibility — before making any data movement or storage investment decisions, index the full unstructured data estate using Komprise Analysis to understand what data exists, where it lives, who owns it, when it was last accessed, and what it costs across all storage silos; this eliminates the guesswork that leads to over-provisioning and missed savings opportunities
  • Establish data-centric policies — replace storage-cluster-based management rules with policies defined by data characteristics such as file age, type, owner, project code, and sensitivity status; Komprise enforces these policies consistently across all storage vendors and clouds from a single platform
  • Address immediate cost pressure — with flash and NAND prices rising 130% by end of 2026 according to Gartner, the fastest path to budget relief is identifying cold data on expensive primary storage and tiering it transparently to lower-cost destinations using Komprise Flash Stretch; reclaiming 70%+ of primary storage capacity without a hardware purchase is achievable in weeks
  • Build toward AI readiness — as data is indexed and classified, the Komprise Global Metadatabase accumulates the metadata foundation that Smart Data Workflows need to curate AI-ready datasets; KAPPA Data Services progressively enrich that foundation with domain-specific metadata extracted from proprietary file formats, making the transition from cost optimization to AI enablement a natural evolution rather than a separate project
  • Maintain governance throughout — Komprise Sensitive Data Management runs continuously across all data movement and classification operations, ensuring that sensitive data is detected, remediated, and audited as the estate grows and as AI workflows consume increasing volumes of unstructured data

The DCIG white paper notes that IT organizations need data-centric management that is a separate layer working across storage and cloud to analyze and move data without creating lock-in; Komprise was built from the ground up on exactly this principle and manages more than one exabyte of enterprise unstructured data today using this approach.

Read the paper now